| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUESTION 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCREASING THE CITY’S
TRANSACTION PRIVILEGE TAX (SALES TAX)
-- RESOLUTION NO. 8648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shall the City of Mesa be authorized to
increase, effective July 1, 2006, the City’s transaction privilege tax
(sales tax) from 1.25% to 1.75%, of which .30% will be used for street
construction, street operations, street maintenance, and street capital
equipment needs and .20% will be used for municipal services, such as
police, fire, courts, parks and recreation, libraries, and other services
authorized by the City of Mesa? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Myth
Over the
past 20 years, Mesa's Sales Tax Revenue per Person
has declined by nearly 20%.
Fact
The opposite is true; there's been a nearly a 40% increase!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Background
At
the February District
Town Meetings the City of Mesa presented a graph showing that over over the
past 20 years there's been a 20% decrease in Retail Sales per Resident .
While technically correct, it’s not a very meaningful measure.
Numerous
statements in the Sample Ballot, the YesForMesa
website, as well as the Financing
the Future report, incorrectly interpret this as meaning
Sales Tax Revenue per Resident.
So,
while over the past 20 years, there has been a decline in Retails
Sales per Resident; the money collected thru Sales
Tax Revenue per Resident
has actually increased--in large part due to the ½-cent Quality-of-Life Sales Tax that kicked-in in
1999.
Even
neglecting the ¼-cent portion
of the Quality-of-Life Sales Tax increase that went to Capital Projects
(mainly the Mesa Arts Center), but including
the remaining ¼-cent portion for Operations (Police, Fire, Library) gives not
a 20-year, 20% decrease but rather an 8½%
increase.
So,
with either rate, the City of Mesa actually wound up collecting more
in Sales Taxes from each resident. The higher Sales
Tax Rate more than compensated for the overall decline in Retail
Sales per Resident.
Simply
put, the only way to get a 20% decline is to completely ignore the
½-cent Quality-of-Life Sales Tax
increase. That’s a pretty
hefty chunk of change.
|
|
|
Details
A more meaningful measure is Retail
Sales Tax Revenues per Person. That's the money citizens
actually pay, and that's the money the city runs on. Here's the real
graph: |
|
|
The
RED data represents the 1% Sales Tax Revenue per
Person rate. Sure enough, the trend is down: 18.4% in 20
years. But you didn't pay 1%, did you?
The GREEN
data represents the true 1½%
Sales Tax implemented in 1999. This is the Sales Tax you actually
paid. Even with the later declines, the trend is up: 39% in 20
years.
The
YELLOW data show the 1¼%
Sales Tax rate that covered Operations (but not Capital Projects).
Even at this rate the trend is still up: 8.6% in 20 years.
All these
numbers are corrected for Inflation as per the City of Mesa data.
Unfortunately, this has the further distorting effect of making $1 in 1983
to be valued at only 51-cents in 2005. Be assured, in 2005 dollars,
the Sales Tax Revenue per Person was actually
$251. The number shown is $251 x 0.51 = $128. |
|
|
Details
A few people have asked about the Sales Tax
Revenues per Person, both WITH and WITHOUT
the Inflation Adjustment. Here's the graph. The upper
"rake" are Actual Dollars, the lower "rake" are
Inflation Adjusted. The lower data is the same as the previous
graph. |
|
|
Details
From the District
Town Meetings presentation, on the slide titled "Budget
Issues" (page 15), the following item is listed:
“Decreasing
utility and sales tax revenues per capita”.
This is a mischaracterization of the data.
Page 16 provides the supporting graph: |
|
|
But this is simply citywide Retail Sales
divided by the Population. Not a very useful
graph.
|
|
|
Details
Here's the simplified and misleading graph
from YesForMesa:
|
|
|
Details
Here's some miscellaneous charts that may be helpful:
|
|
Here's the SpreadSheet. The
BLUE Section is the City of Mesa Data. The other sections are
mine.
RETAIL
SALES PER RESIDENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FISCAL YEAR 84/85 to FISCAL
YEAR 04/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MESA
- SALES TAX REVENUES AS RECEIVED |
|
|
|
1%
Sales Tax Table |
|
1 1/4%
Sales Tax Table |
|
1 1/2%
Sales Tax Table |
|
1/2%
Quality of Life
Sales Tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
Year
Ending |
Population |
U.S. CPI
Purchasing
Power of
the Dollar |
Sales Tax
Revenues |
Sales
Tax
Rate |
Retail Sales |
Retail
Sales
per
Resident |
Adjusted
Retail
Sales
per
Resident |
|
Retail Sales
(Adjusted) |
|
Sales Tax
Rate |
Retail
Sales Tax
Revenues |
Retail
Sale Tax
Revenues
(Adjusted) |
Retail
Sales Tax
Revenue
per Capita |
Retail
Sales Tax
Revenue
per Capita
(Adjusted) |
|
Sales Tax
Rate |
Retail
Sales Tax
Revenues |
Retail
Sale Tax
Revenues
(Adjusted) |
Retail
Sales Tax
Revenue
per Capita |
Retail
Sales Tax
Revenue
per Capita
(Adjusted) |
|
Sales Tax
Rate |
Retail
Sales Tax
Revenues |
Retail
Sale Tax
Revenues
(Adjusted) |
Retail
Sales Tax
Revenue
per Capita |
Retail
Sales Tax
Revenue
per Capita
(Adjusted) |
|
Sales Tax
Rate |
Retail
Sales Tax
Revenues
(Quality
of Life
Portion) |
1985 |
222,050 |
$0.93 |
$26,208,215 |
1.00% |
$2,620,821,500 |
$11,803 |
$10,977 |
|
$2,437,363,995 |
|
1.00% |
$26,208,215 |
$24,373,640 |
$118 |
$110 |
|
1.00% |
$26,208,215 |
$24,373,640 |
$118 |
$110 |
|
1.00% |
$26,208,215 |
$24,373,640 |
$118 |
$110 |
|
|
|
1986 |
239,036 |
$0.91 |
$30,261,188 |
1.00% |
$3,026,118,800 |
$12,660 |
$11,521 |
|
$2,753,768,108 |
|
1.00% |
$30,261,188 |
$27,537,681 |
$127 |
$115 |
|
1.00% |
$30,261,188 |
$27,537,681 |
$127 |
$115 |
|
1.00% |
$30,261,188 |
$27,537,681 |
$127 |
$115 |
|
|
|
1987 |
248,750 |
$0.88 |
$33,071,286 |
1.00% |
$3,307,128,600 |
$13,295 |
$11,700 |
|
$2,910,273,168 |
|
1.00% |
$33,071,286 |
$29,102,732 |
$133 |
$117 |
|
1.00% |
$33,071,286 |
$29,102,732 |
$133 |
$117 |
|
1.00% |
$33,071,286 |
$29,102,732 |
$133 |
$117 |
|
|
|
1988 |
258,664 |
$0.85 |
$33,844,899 |
1.00% |
$3,384,489,900 |
$13,085 |
$11,122 |
|
$2,876,816,415 |
|
1.00% |
$33,844,899 |
$28,768,164 |
$131 |
$111 |
|
1.00% |
$33,844,899 |
$28,768,164 |
$131 |
$111 |
|
1.00% |
$33,844,899 |
$28,768,164 |
$131 |
$111 |
|
|
|
1989 |
267,664 |
$0.81 |
$35,175,584 |
1.00% |
$3,517,558,400 |
$13,142 |
$10,645 |
|
$2,849,222,304 |
|
1.00% |
$35,175,584 |
$28,492,223 |
$131 |
$106 |
|
1.00% |
$35,175,584 |
$28,492,223 |
$131 |
$106 |
|
1.00% |
$35,175,584 |
$28,492,223 |
$131 |
$106 |
|
|
|
1990 |
278,292 |
$0.77 |
$34,314,133 |
1.00% |
$3,431,413,300 |
$12,330 |
$9,494 |
|
$2,642,188,241 |
|
1.00% |
$34,314,133 |
$26,421,882 |
$123 |
$95 |
|
1.00% |
$34,314,133 |
$26,421,882 |
$123 |
$95 |
|
1.00% |
$34,314,133 |
$26,421,882 |
$123 |
$95 |
|
|
|
1991 |
288,730 |
$0.73 |
$36,127,063 |
1.00% |
$3,612,706,300 |
$12,512 |
$9,134 |
|
$2,637,275,599 |
|
1.00% |
$36,127,063 |
$26,372,756 |
$125 |
$91 |
|
1.00% |
$36,127,063 |
$26,372,756 |
$125 |
$91 |
|
1.00% |
$36,127,063 |
$26,372,756 |
$125 |
$91 |
|
|
|
1992 |
297,270 |
$0.71 |
$36,973,175 |
1.00% |
$3,697,317,500 |
$12,438 |
$8,831 |
|
$2,625,095,425 |
|
1.00% |
$36,973,175 |
$26,250,954 |
$124 |
$88 |
|
1.00% |
$36,973,175 |
$26,250,954 |
$124 |
$88 |
|
1.00% |
$36,973,175 |
$26,250,954 |
$124 |
$88 |
|
|
|
1993 |
304,350 |
$0.69 |
$40,056,942 |
1.00% |
$4,005,694,200 |
$13,161 |
$9,081 |
|
$2,763,928,998 |
|
1.00% |
$40,056,942 |
$27,639,290 |
$132 |
$91 |
|
1.00% |
$40,056,942 |
$27,639,290 |
$132 |
$91 |
|
1.00% |
$40,056,942 |
$27,639,290 |
$132 |
$91 |
|
|
|
1994 |
313,760 |
$0.67 |
$45,062,035 |
1.00% |
$4,506,203,500 |
$14,362 |
$9,623 |
|
$3,019,156,345 |
|
1.00% |
$45,062,035 |
$30,191,563 |
$144 |
$96 |
|
1.00% |
$45,062,035 |
$30,191,563 |
$144 |
$96 |
|
1.00% |
$45,062,035 |
$30,191,563 |
$144 |
$96 |
|
|
|
1995 |
325,775 |
$0.66 |
$49,725,691 |
1.00% |
$4,972,569,100 |
$15,264 |
$10,074 |
|
$3,281,895,606 |
|
1.00% |
$49,725,691 |
$32,818,956 |
$153 |
$101 |
|
1.00% |
$49,725,691 |
$32,818,956 |
$153 |
$101 |
|
1.00% |
$49,725,691 |
$32,818,956 |
$153 |
$101 |
|
|
|
1996 |
336,550 |
$0.64 |
$54,599,867 |
1.00% |
$5,459,986,700 |
$16,223 |
$10,383 |
|
$3,494,391,488 |
|
1.00% |
$54,599,867 |
$34,943,915 |
$162 |
$104 |
|
1.00% |
$54,599,867 |
$34,943,915 |
$162 |
$104 |
|
1.00% |
$54,599,867 |
$34,943,915 |
$162 |
$104 |
|
|
|
1997 |
345,580 |
$0.62 |
$58,290,598 |
1.00% |
$5,829,059,800 |
$16,867 |
$10,458 |
|
$3,614,017,076 |
|
1.00% |
$58,290,598 |
$36,140,171 |
$169 |
$105 |
|
1.00% |
$58,290,598 |
$36,140,171 |
$169 |
$105 |
|
1.00% |
$58,290,598 |
$36,140,171 |
$169 |
$105 |
|
|
|
1998 |
354,165 |
$0.61 |
$62,406,323 |
1.00% |
$6,240,632,300 |
$17,621 |
$10,749 |
|
$3,806,785,703 |
|
1.00% |
$62,406,323 |
$38,067,857 |
$176 |
$107 |
|
1.00% |
$62,406,323 |
$38,067,857 |
$176 |
$107 |
|
1.00% |
$62,406,323 |
$38,067,857 |
$176 |
$107 |
|
|
|
1999 |
366,825 |
$0.60 |
$93,925,852 |
1.50% |
$6,261,723,467 |
$17,070 |
$10,242 |
|
$3,757,034,080 |
|
1.00% |
$62,617,235 |
$37,570,341 |
$171 |
$102 |
|
1.25% |
$78,271,543 |
$46,962,926 |
$213 |
$128 |
|
1.50% |
$93,925,852 |
$56,355,511 |
$256 |
$154 |
|
0.50% |
$31,308,617 |
2000 |
379,250 |
$0.58 |
$105,742,329 |
1.50% |
$7,049,488,600 |
$18,588 |
$10,781 |
|
$4,088,703,388 |
|
1.00% |
$70,494,886 |
$40,887,034 |
$186 |
$108 |
|
1.25% |
$88,118,608 |
$51,108,792 |
$232 |
$135 |
|
1.50% |
$105,742,329 |
$61,330,551 |
$279 |
$162 |
|
0.50% |
$35,247,443 |
2001 |
401,180 |
$0.56 |
$102,331,304 |
1.50% |
$6,822,086,933 |
$17,005 |
$9,523 |
|
$3,820,368,683 |
|
1.00% |
$68,220,869 |
$38,203,687 |
$170 |
$95 |
|
1.25% |
$85,276,087 |
$47,754,609 |
$213 |
$119 |
|
1.50% |
$102,331,304 |
$57,305,530 |
$255 |
$143 |
|
0.50% |
$34,110,435 |
2002 |
414,075 |
$0.56 |
$102,654,158 |
1.50% |
$6,843,610,533 |
$16,527 |
$9,255 |
|
$3,832,421,899 |
|
1.00% |
$68,436,105 |
$38,324,219 |
$165 |
$93 |
|
1.25% |
$85,545,132 |
$47,905,274 |
$207 |
$116 |
|
1.50% |
$102,654,158 |
$57,486,328 |
$248 |
$139 |
|
0.50% |
$34,218,053 |
2003 |
427,550 |
$0.54 |
$98,965,814 |
1.50% |
$6,597,720,933 |
$15,431 |
$8,333 |
|
$3,562,769,304 |
|
1.00% |
$65,977,209 |
$35,627,693 |
$154 |
$83 |
|
1.25% |
$82,471,512 |
$44,534,616 |
$193 |
$104 |
|
1.50% |
$98,965,814 |
$53,441,540 |
$231 |
$125 |
|
0.50% |
$32,988,605 |
2004 |
434,215 |
$0.53 |
$105,505,475 |
1.50% |
$7,033,698,333 |
$16,199 |
$8,585 |
|
$3,727,860,117 |
|
1.00% |
$70,336,983 |
$37,278,601 |
$162 |
$86 |
|
1.25% |
$87,921,229 |
$46,598,251 |
$202 |
$107 |
|
1.50% |
$105,505,475 |
$55,917,902 |
$243 |
$129 |
|
0.50% |
$35,168,492 |
2005 |
447,000 |
$0.51 |
$112,103,984 |
1.50% |
$7,473,598,933 |
$16,719 |
$8,527 |
|
$3,811,535,456 |
|
1.00% |
$74,735,989 |
$38,115,355 |
$167 |
$85 |
|
1.25% |
$93,419,987 |
$47,644,193 |
$209 |
$107 |
|
1.50% |
$112,103,984 |
$57,173,032 |
$251 |
$128 |
|
0.50% |
$37,367,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$240,409,639 |
|
99% |
-46% |
666% |
|
204% |
47% |
-18% |
|
60% |
|
|
204% |
60% |
47% |
-18% |
|
|
373% |
122% |
102% |
8.6% |
|
|
666% |
202% |
171% |
39% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|